The constructor of `Result` has many arguments, but that's not the
primary reason why I'm making this change. I want to change the
constructor, and it will become more complicated, so having this named
constructor will be useful in the next refactoring.
With this change, I also made the `id` mandatory. That made the
constructor look neater and most to promote almost all properties to the
constructor.
Another change was removing the `fromAdjacent` method, which was quite
confusing. I created the `asAdjacentOf` method, which is a bit clearer.
If anything, it makes all static methods named constructors. It will be
a bit more verbose, but more intuitive.
The `{{name}}` placeholder could represent different things depending on
the state of the Result, and referring to it as `{{name}}` seems
arbitrary. This commit changes it to `{{subject}}`, which is much more
generic and it describes well what that placeholder can mean.
We want to release version 3.0 as fresh as possible, without having to
maintain backward compatibility with the previous versions. Because that
version will be on for some time, we decided it will be best to support
only PHP version 8.5 or higher.
Acked-by: Alexandre Gomes Gaigalas <alganet@gmail.com>
We want to release version 3.0 as fresh as possible, without having to
maintain backward compatibility with the previous versions.
Acked-by: Alexandre Gomes Gaigalas <alganet@gmail.com>
With this change, any rule can be used as a PHP attribute. I have wanted
to implement this feature for a while, as it allows you to bind the
validation to a specific property and just validate the object
afterwards.
Although helpful, the changes in the Min, Max, and Length rules made
using those rules more verbose. This commit will simplify their use by
allowing users to use them as prefixes.
Because I was creating prefixes for those rules, I made other cool
prefixes. Doing that is scary because it will generate more code to
support, and I would have liked to avoid that. However, that's a
valuable addition, and it's worth the risk.
I might reconsider that in the future, but for now, that looks like a
good idea.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
That helps organize the code better, making it easier to spot the core
rule. It also helps not allow the Factory to load those rules, as the
new namespace is not registered in it.
Note that the "AbstractAge", "AbstractRelated", and "AbstractRule" were
not moved. I want to do that only when I refactor them.
After I moved classes, I realized that "Comparison" and "FilteredString"
had no tests. I created the tests, and while I did that, I spotted two
bugs:
* The "Equals" rule was failing when comparing non-scalar wth scalar
values;
* The "Equals" and "Identical" rules were not working correctly because
"Comparison" was converting their values.
I fixed those bugs in this commit.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
So far, I haven't seen any real case for that, but it's not like I have
a strong case for not allowing that, I just want to keep the code clean.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
Creating a specific exception for each rule adds a painful overhead. If
you want to make a custom message for your rule, you will need to create
an exception and then register that exception namespace to be able to
use it—all that is just for customizing the message of your rule.
Having different namespaces also implies that you need to fetch the
exception of the rule from another directory to change it. As Uncle Bob
said, "Classes that change together belong together. Classes that are
not reused together should not be grouped."
This commit will drastically change this library, moving all the
templates from the exceptions to the rules. Consequently, the Factory
becomes much simpler, and the library gets a bit smaller, too.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
Currently, we convert the properties of a rule into parameters and pass
them to the exceptions. That complicates things for a few reasons:
1. The exception knows too much: there's a lot of information in an
object, and the exception would only need a few parameters to work
correctly.
2. Any variable change becomes a backward compatibility break: if we
change the name of the variable type in a rule, even if it's a
private one, we may need to change the template, which is a backward
compatibility break.
3. The factory is bloated because of introspection tricks: it reads the
properties from the class, even from the parent, and then passes it
to the exception.
Of course, that means we introduce another method to `Validatable`, but
in most cases, extending `AbstractRule` is enough to create a new rule.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
That will make it clear that we should not overwrite some properties.
Because of this change, I've made a few refactorings here and there.
It's nice to see that I've spotted some issues just because I was
setting some properties as `readonly`.
There are a few properties that I would like to make read-only, but to
do that I'd need to refactor a lot of code, so for now, I'm keeping it
as is.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
This change will bring many breaking changes. The good thing is that we
can finally use more modern resources available in PHP.
I can imagine that's not a popular change since it will bring many
breaking changes to users, but we shouldn't be stuck in time because of
that. Using some of those features will make it easier to contribute to
the project. At least, I hope so.
There are still some useless doc-blocks, and we're not using "readonly"
properties when we could. I aim to send those changes soon.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
According to the official documentation [1] the correct way of writing
the "inheritDoc" tag is with the uppercase "D".
[1]: https://docs.phpdoc.org/guides/inheritance.html
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
