Creating a specific exception for each rule adds a painful overhead. If
you want to make a custom message for your rule, you will need to create
an exception and then register that exception namespace to be able to
use it—all that is just for customizing the message of your rule.
Having different namespaces also implies that you need to fetch the
exception of the rule from another directory to change it. As Uncle Bob
said, "Classes that change together belong together. Classes that are
not reused together should not be grouped."
This commit will drastically change this library, moving all the
templates from the exceptions to the rules. Consequently, the Factory
becomes much simpler, and the library gets a bit smaller, too.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
That will make it clear that we should not overwrite some properties.
Because of this change, I've made a few refactorings here and there.
It's nice to see that I've spotted some issues just because I was
setting some properties as `readonly`.
There are a few properties that I would like to make read-only, but to
do that I'd need to refactor a lot of code, so for now, I'm keeping it
as is.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
This change will bring many breaking changes. The good thing is that we
can finally use more modern resources available in PHP.
I can imagine that's not a popular change since it will bring many
breaking changes to users, but we shouldn't be stuck in time because of
that. Using some of those features will make it easier to contribute to
the project. At least, I hope so.
There are still some useless doc-blocks, and we're not using "readonly"
properties when we could. I aim to send those changes soon.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
I can't explain why, but depending on the environment, some tests of the
"Call" rule was failing.
This commit will add a test for the "validate()" method, and also use a
more clean way to trigger and handle a PHP error.
Co-authored-by: Casey McLaughlin <caseyamcl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
The "Call" validator, the "assert()" and "check()" methods, define a
custom error handler so it can handle the validation in case of a PHP
error. However, it does not restor the previous error handler when the
validation fails.
Co-authored-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
Due to the current status of the development of the library, it seems
like we will be supporting version 1.1 for a long time. Even when we
release version 2.0 we will still give support for version 1.1 for a
while.
This commit will make sure that version 1.1 is fully supported for PHP
7.2 and 7.3. Also, it will remove the support for HHVM since it will not
keep the compatibility with PHP anymore [1].
In order to make that happen, this commit will create a TestCase from
Validation so we can use the same API to create mocks in both PHPUnit
versions 4.0 and 5.0.
During the development of this commit, I noticed that PHPUnit 4.0 had
issues to mock "SplFileInfo" and for that reason, this commit will also
replace those mocks by "SplFileInfo" instances.
[1]: https://hhvm.com/blog/2018/09/12/end-of-php-support-future-of-hack.html
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
The callable defined to the "Call" rule may also throw an exception and
as we don't want to have errors nor exceptions that are not part of the
Validation during the validation of inputs it just makes sense to
intercept any instance of Throwable.
This change was initially thought of because in Travis the version 7.4
of PHP was throwing "Error" instead of triggering PHP errors which made
the tests fail.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
This commit make sure that when the callable is executed by the "Call"
rule and PHP triggers an error, the user does not have to deal with it,
and instead the rule will throw "CallException".
Because of the many changes that were made, it didn't make sense to keep
the class "Call" extending the "AbstractRelated" class.
One thing that is a bit problematic with this rule - and with other
rules as well - is that Validation only knows details of a validation
when it fails, because of that we cannot invert the validations that
passed, meaning that the "Not" rule cannot give the proper response to
a validation that passed. This is a know issue that can only be fixed
is we provide a way for Validation do have more granularity control.
Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
