mirror of
https://github.com/Respect/Validation.git
synced 2026-03-17 07:45:45 +01:00
94daa8d669Although I love PHPT files, and I've done my fair share of making it easier to write them in this library, they're very slow, and running them has become a hindrance. I've been fidgeting with the idea of using Pest for a while, and I think it's the right tool for the job. I had to create a couple of functions to make it easier to run those tests, and now they're working really alright. I migrated all the PHPT files into Pest files -- I automated most of the work with a little script using "nikic/php-parser"; this commit should contain all the previous PHPT tests as Pest tests. The previous integration tests would take sixteen seconds, and the Pest tests take less than a second.
215 lines
6.9 KiB
PHP
215 lines
6.9 KiB
PHP
<?php
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Copyright (c) Alexandre Gomes Gaigalas <alganet@gmail.com>
|
|
* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
declare(strict_types=1);
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / one failed', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::key('foo', v::intType()))->assert(['foo' => 'string']),
|
|
'foo must be an integer',
|
|
'- foo must be an integer',
|
|
['foo' => 'foo must be an integer']
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / one missing key', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))->assert([]),
|
|
'foo must be present',
|
|
'- foo must be present',
|
|
['foo' => 'foo must be present']
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / one extra key', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string']),
|
|
'bar must not be present',
|
|
'- bar must not be present',
|
|
['bar' => 'bar must not be present']
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / one extra key / one missing key', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))->assert(['bar' => true]),
|
|
'foo must be present',
|
|
<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["bar": true]` contains both missing and extra keys
|
|
- foo must be present
|
|
- bar must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE,
|
|
[
|
|
'__root__' => '`["bar": true]` contains both missing and extra keys',
|
|
'foo' => 'foo must be present',
|
|
'bar' => 'bar must not be present',
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / two extra keys', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true]),
|
|
'bar must not be present',
|
|
<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true]` contains extra keys
|
|
- bar must not be present
|
|
- baz must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE,
|
|
[
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true]` contains extra keys',
|
|
'bar' => 'bar must not be present',
|
|
'baz' => 'baz must not be present',
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / more than ten extra keys', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))
|
|
->assert([
|
|
'foo' => 42,
|
|
'bar' => 'string',
|
|
'baz' => true,
|
|
'qux' => false,
|
|
'quux' => 42,
|
|
'corge' => 'string',
|
|
'grault' => true,
|
|
'garply' => false,
|
|
'waldo' => 42,
|
|
'fred' => 'string',
|
|
'plugh' => true,
|
|
'xyzzy' => false,
|
|
'thud' => 42,
|
|
]),
|
|
'bar must not be present',
|
|
<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true, "qux": false, "quux": 42, ...]` contains extra keys
|
|
- bar must not be present
|
|
- baz must not be present
|
|
- qux must not be present
|
|
- quux must not be present
|
|
- corge must not be present
|
|
- grault must not be present
|
|
- garply must not be present
|
|
- waldo must not be present
|
|
- fred must not be present
|
|
- plugh must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE,
|
|
[
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true, "qux": false, "quux": 42, ...]` contains extra keys',
|
|
'bar' => 'bar must not be present',
|
|
'baz' => 'baz must not be present',
|
|
'qux' => 'qux must not be present',
|
|
'quux' => 'quux must not be present',
|
|
'corge' => 'corge must not be present',
|
|
'grault' => 'grault must not be present',
|
|
'garply' => 'garply must not be present',
|
|
'waldo' => 'waldo must not be present',
|
|
'fred' => 'fred must not be present',
|
|
'plugh' => 'plugh must not be present',
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / one failed', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'), v::keyExists('bar'))->assert(['foo' => 42]),
|
|
'bar must be present',
|
|
'- bar must be present',
|
|
['bar' => 'bar must be present']
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / all failed', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'), v::keyExists('bar'))->assert([]),
|
|
'foo must be present',
|
|
<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `[]` contains missing keys
|
|
- foo must be present
|
|
- bar must be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE,
|
|
[
|
|
'__root__' => '`[]` contains missing keys',
|
|
'foo' => 'foo must be present',
|
|
'bar' => 'bar must be present',
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / one extra key', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::keyExists('foo'),
|
|
v::keyExists('bar')
|
|
)->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true]),
|
|
'baz must not be present',
|
|
'- baz must not be present',
|
|
['baz' => 'baz must not be present']
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / one extra key / one missing', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::keyExists('foo'),
|
|
v::keyExists('bar')
|
|
)->assert(['bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true]),
|
|
'foo must be present',
|
|
<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["bar": "string", "baz": true]` contains both missing and extra keys
|
|
- foo must be present
|
|
- baz must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE,
|
|
[
|
|
'__root__' => '`["bar": "string", "baz": true]` contains both missing and extra keys',
|
|
'foo' => 'foo must be present',
|
|
'baz' => 'baz must not be present',
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / two extra keys', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::keyExists('foo'),
|
|
v::keyExists('bar'),
|
|
v::keyOptional('qux', v::intType())
|
|
)->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true, 'qux' => false]),
|
|
'qux must be an integer',
|
|
<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true, "qux": false]` contains extra keys
|
|
- qux must be an integer
|
|
- baz must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE,
|
|
[
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true, "qux": false]` contains extra keys',
|
|
'qux' => 'qux must be an integer',
|
|
'baz' => 'baz must not be present',
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / all failed validation', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::key('foo', v::intType()),
|
|
v::key('bar', v::intType()),
|
|
v::key('baz', v::intType())
|
|
)
|
|
->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true]),
|
|
'bar must be an integer',
|
|
<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true]` validation failed
|
|
- bar must be an integer
|
|
- baz must be an integer
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE,
|
|
[
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true]` validation failed',
|
|
'bar' => 'bar must be an integer',
|
|
'baz' => 'baz must be an integer',
|
|
]
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / single missing key / single failed validation', expectAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::create()
|
|
->key('foo', v::intType())
|
|
->key('bar', v::intType())
|
|
->key('baz', v::intType())
|
|
)
|
|
->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string']),
|
|
'bar must be an integer',
|
|
<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string"]` contains missing keys
|
|
- bar must be an integer
|
|
- baz must be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE,
|
|
[
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string"]` contains missing keys',
|
|
'bar' => 'bar must be an integer',
|
|
'baz' => 'baz must be present',
|
|
]
|
|
));
|