mirror of
https://github.com/Respect/Validation.git
synced 2026-03-16 23:35:45 +01:00
951c16e8e6Since we have the ability to use `not` as a prefix, having rules that validate negative behaviour makes them a bit inflexible, verbose, and harder to understand. This commit will refactor the `NotEmoji` and rename it to `Emoji`. It will no longer check if the string contains emojis, but rather if the string is an emoji or not. I’m also adding support to more emojis, since the rule was a bit outdated. This change will make the validator more strict, but will make it useful in other scenarios. However, later on, I would like to create a rule called `has` which, could use a validator like `Emoji` to check if the input _has_ emojis. Assisted-by: Cursor (claude-4.5-opus-high)
24 lines
858 B
PHP
24 lines
858 B
PHP
<?php
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Copyright (c) Alexandre Gomes Gaigalas <alganet@gmail.com>
|
|
* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
declare(strict_types=1);
|
|
|
|
test('default template', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::emoji()->assert('☎︎'),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('"☎︎" must be an emoji')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe('- "☎︎" must be an emoji')
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe(['emoji' => '"☎︎" must be an emoji']),
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('inverted template', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::not(v::emoji())->assert('🐼'),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('"🐼" must not be an emoji')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe('- "🐼" must not be an emoji')
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe(['notEmoji' => '"🐼" must not be an emoji']),
|
|
));
|