mirror of
https://github.com/Respect/Validation.git
synced 2026-03-17 07:45:45 +01:00
d3239e878dThe problem with the current approach is that the "expect()" calls happen inside "tests/Pest.php". That means that when something fails, we can't easily know which exact expectation has failed. This commit will change the helper functions, and will make the tests more verbose, but event with that, the developer experience is better.
228 lines
9.4 KiB
PHP
228 lines
9.4 KiB
PHP
<?php
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Copyright (c) Alexandre Gomes Gaigalas <alganet@gmail.com>
|
|
* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
declare(strict_types=1);
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / one failed', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::key('foo', v::intType()))->assert(['foo' => 'string']),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.foo` must be an integer')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe('- `.foo` must be an integer')
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe(['foo' => '`.foo` must be an integer'])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / one missing key', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))->assert([]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.foo` must be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe('- `.foo` must be present')
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe(['foo' => '`.foo` must be present'])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / one extra key', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string']),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.bar` must not be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe('- `.bar` must not be present')
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe(['bar' => '`.bar` must not be present'])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / one extra key / one missing key', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))->assert(['bar' => true]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.foo` must be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe(<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["bar": true]` contains both missing and extra keys
|
|
- `.foo` must be present
|
|
- `.bar` must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE)
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe([
|
|
'__root__' => '`["bar": true]` contains both missing and extra keys',
|
|
'foo' => '`.foo` must be present',
|
|
'bar' => '`.bar` must not be present',
|
|
])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / two extra keys', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.bar` must not be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe(<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true]` contains extra keys
|
|
- `.bar` must not be present
|
|
- `.baz` must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE)
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe([
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true]` contains extra keys',
|
|
'bar' => '`.bar` must not be present',
|
|
'baz' => '`.baz` must not be present',
|
|
])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('one rule / more than ten extra keys', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'))
|
|
->assert([
|
|
'foo' => 42,
|
|
'bar' => 'string',
|
|
'baz' => true,
|
|
'qux' => false,
|
|
'quux' => 42,
|
|
'corge' => 'string',
|
|
'grault' => true,
|
|
'garply' => false,
|
|
'waldo' => 42,
|
|
'fred' => 'string',
|
|
'plugh' => true,
|
|
'xyzzy' => false,
|
|
'thud' => 42,
|
|
]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.bar` must not be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe(<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true, "qux": false, "quux": 42, ...]` contains extra keys
|
|
- `.bar` must not be present
|
|
- `.baz` must not be present
|
|
- `.qux` must not be present
|
|
- `.quux` must not be present
|
|
- `.corge` must not be present
|
|
- `.grault` must not be present
|
|
- `.garply` must not be present
|
|
- `.waldo` must not be present
|
|
- `.fred` must not be present
|
|
- `.plugh` must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE)
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe([
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true, "qux": false, "quux": 42, ...]` contains extra keys',
|
|
'bar' => '`.bar` must not be present',
|
|
'baz' => '`.baz` must not be present',
|
|
'qux' => '`.qux` must not be present',
|
|
'quux' => '`.quux` must not be present',
|
|
'corge' => '`.corge` must not be present',
|
|
'grault' => '`.grault` must not be present',
|
|
'garply' => '`.garply` must not be present',
|
|
'waldo' => '`.waldo` must not be present',
|
|
'fred' => '`.fred` must not be present',
|
|
'plugh' => '`.plugh` must not be present',
|
|
])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / one failed', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'), v::keyExists('bar'))->assert(['foo' => 42]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.bar` must be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe('- `.bar` must be present')
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe(['bar' => '`.bar` must be present'])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / all failed', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(v::keyExists('foo'), v::keyExists('bar'))->assert([]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.foo` must be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe(<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `[]` contains missing keys
|
|
- `.foo` must be present
|
|
- `.bar` must be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE)
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe([
|
|
'__root__' => '`[]` contains missing keys',
|
|
'foo' => '`.foo` must be present',
|
|
'bar' => '`.bar` must be present',
|
|
])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / one extra key', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::keyExists('foo'),
|
|
v::keyExists('bar'),
|
|
)->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.baz` must not be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe('- `.baz` must not be present')
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe(['baz' => '`.baz` must not be present'])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / one extra key / one missing', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::keyExists('foo'),
|
|
v::keyExists('bar'),
|
|
)->assert(['bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.foo` must be present')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe(<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["bar": "string", "baz": true]` contains both missing and extra keys
|
|
- `.foo` must be present
|
|
- `.baz` must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE)
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe([
|
|
'__root__' => '`["bar": "string", "baz": true]` contains both missing and extra keys',
|
|
'foo' => '`.foo` must be present',
|
|
'baz' => '`.baz` must not be present',
|
|
])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / two extra keys', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::keyExists('foo'),
|
|
v::keyExists('bar'),
|
|
v::keyOptional('qux', v::intType()),
|
|
)->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true, 'qux' => false]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.qux` must be an integer')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe(<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true, "qux": false]` contains extra keys
|
|
- `.qux` must be an integer
|
|
- `.baz` must not be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE)
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe([
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true, "qux": false]` contains extra keys',
|
|
'qux' => '`.qux` must be an integer',
|
|
'baz' => '`.baz` must not be present',
|
|
])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / all failed validation', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::key('foo', v::intType()),
|
|
v::key('bar', v::intType()),
|
|
v::key('baz', v::intType()),
|
|
)
|
|
->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string', 'baz' => true]),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.bar` must be an integer')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe(<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true]` validation failed
|
|
- `.bar` must be an integer
|
|
- `.baz` must be an integer
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE)
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe([
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string", "baz": true]` validation failed',
|
|
'bar' => '`.bar` must be an integer',
|
|
'baz' => '`.baz` must be an integer',
|
|
])
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
test('multiple rules / single missing key / single failed validation', catchAll(
|
|
fn() => v::keySet(
|
|
v::create()
|
|
->key('foo', v::intType())
|
|
->key('bar', v::intType())
|
|
->key('baz', v::intType()),
|
|
)
|
|
->assert(['foo' => 42, 'bar' => 'string']),
|
|
fn(string $message, string $fullMessage, array $messages) => expect()
|
|
->and($message)->toBe('`.bar` must be an integer')
|
|
->and($fullMessage)->toBe(<<<'FULL_MESSAGE'
|
|
- `["foo": 42, "bar": "string"]` contains missing keys
|
|
- `.bar` must be an integer
|
|
- `.baz` must be present
|
|
FULL_MESSAGE)
|
|
->and($messages)->toBe([
|
|
'__root__' => '`["foo": 42, "bar": "string"]` contains missing keys',
|
|
'bar' => '`.bar` must be an integer',
|
|
'baz' => '`.baz` must be present',
|
|
])
|
|
));
|