Commit graph

717 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Xinyu Zhou 7cc7db73b9
Add option to prohibit fork if user reached maximum limit of repositories (#21848)
If user has reached the maximum limit of repositories:

- Before
  - disallow create
  - allow fork without limit
- This patch:
  - disallow create
  - disallow fork
- Add option `ALLOW_FORK_WITHOUT_MAXIMUM_LIMIT` (Default **true**) :
enable this allow user fork repositories without maximum number limit

fixed https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21847

Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
2022-12-27 15:21:14 -06:00
Jason Song 6cf09ccab4
Use complete SHA to create and query commit status (#22244)
Fix #13485.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-27 21:12:49 +08:00
Jason Song 71ca3067bc
Check primary keys for all tables and drop ForeignReference (#21721)
Some dbs require that all tables have primary keys, see
- #16802
- #21086

We can add a test to keep it from being broken again.

Edit:

~Added missing primary key for `ForeignReference`~ Dropped the
`ForeignReference` table to satisfy the check, so it closes #21086.

More context can be found in comments.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2022-12-23 19:35:43 +08:00
Jason Song 659055138b
Secrets storage with SecretKey encrypted (#22142)
Fork of #14483, but [gave up
MasterKey](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/14483#issuecomment-1350728557),
and fixed some problems.

Close #12065.
Needed by #13539.

Featrues:
- Secrets for repo and org, not user yet.
- Use SecretKey to encrypte/encrypt secrets.
- Trim spaces of secret value.
- Add a new locale ini block, to make it easy to support secrets for
user.

Snapshots:

Repo level secrets:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823319-b8a4903f-38ca-4af7-9d05-336a5af906f3.png)

Rrg level secrets

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823371-8bd02e93-1928-40d1-8c76-f48b255ace36.png)

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2022-12-20 17:07:13 +08:00
zeripath d6b96627c1
Add setting to disable the git apply step in test patch (#22130)
For a long time Gitea has tested PR patches using a git apply --check
method, and in fact prior to the introduction of a read-tree assisted
three-way merge in #18004, this was the only way of checking patches.

Since #18004, the git apply --check method has been a fallback method,
only used when the read-tree three-way merge method has detected a
conflict. The read-tree assisted three-way merge method is much faster
and less resource intensive method of detecting conflicts. #18004 kept
the git apply method around because it was thought possible that this
fallback might be able to rectify conflicts that the read-tree three-way
merge detected. I am not certain if this could ever be the case.

Given the uncertainty here and the now relative stability of the
read-tree method - this PR makes using this fallback optional and
disables it by default. The hope is that users will not notice any
significant difference in conflict detection and we will be able to
remove the git apply fallback in future, and/or improve the read-tree
three-way merge method to catch any conflicts that git apply method
might have been able to fix.

An additional benefit is that patch checking should be significantly
less resource intensive and much quicker.

(See
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22083\#issuecomment-1347961737)

Ref #22083

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2022-12-19 19:37:15 +08:00
Christian Ullrich 84285a1169
Do not list active repositories as unadopted (#22034)
This fixes a bug where, when searching unadopted repositories, active
repositories will be listed as well. This is because the size of the
array of repository names to check is larger by one than the
`IterateBufferSize`.

For an `IterateBufferSize` of 50, the original code will pass 51
repository names but set the query to `LIMIT 50`. If all repositories in
the query are active (i.e. not unadopted) one of them will be omitted
from the result. Due to the `ORDER BY` clause it will be the oldest (or
least recently modified) one.

Bug found in 1.17.3.

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-16 16:58:56 +08:00
zeripath 651fe4bb7d
Add doctor command for full GC of LFS (#21978)
The recent PR adding orphaned checks to the LFS storage is not
sufficient to completely GC LFS, as it is possible for LFSMetaObjects to
remain associated with repos but still need to be garbage collected.

Imagine a situation where a branch is uploaded containing LFS files but
that branch is later completely deleted. The LFSMetaObjects will remain
associated with the Repository but the Repository will no longer contain
any pointers to the object.

This PR adds a second doctor command to perform a full GC.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-12-15 20:44:16 +00:00
zeripath cdc43454a4
Correctly handle moved files in apply patch (#22118)
Moved files in a patch will result in git apply returning:

```
error: {filename}: No such file or directory
```

This wasn't handled by the git apply patch code. This PR adds handling
for this.

Fix #22083

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2022-12-14 21:45:33 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 003b4e209c
Allow disable code tab (#20805)
I know some users created a repository in an organization but just use
issues and projects to handle the whole organizations issues. So that
`Code` could be disabled per repository.

<img width="1148" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/184792075-346cb508-b620-4adb-bc9a-cba76fdcb294.png">

It could also become a wiki repository.

<img width="1173" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/184792324-e15c6f68-35c0-4105-ab77-83585ce53672.png">

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-12-12 13:29:27 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 68704532c2
Rename almost all Ctx functions (#22071) 2022-12-10 10:46:31 +08:00
KN4CK3R 3c59d31bc6
Add API management for issue/pull and comment attachments (#21783)
Close #14601
Fix #3690

Revive of #14601.
Updated to current code, cleanup and added more read/write checks.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andre Bruch <ab@andrebruch.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-09 14:35:56 +08:00
Jason Song 74874d065f
Fix issue/PR numbers (#22037)
When deleting a closed issue, we should update both `NumIssues`and
`NumClosedIssues`, or `NumOpenIssues`(`= NumIssues -NumClosedIssues`)
will be wrong. It's the same for pull requests.

Releated to #21557.

Alse fixed two harmless problems:

- The SQL to check issue/PR total numbers is wrong, that means it will
update the numbers even if they are correct.
- Replace legacy `num_issues = num_issues + 1` operations with
`UpdateRepoIssueNumbers`.
2022-12-06 15:53:09 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 0a7d3ff786
refactor some functions to support ctx as first parameter (#21878)
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2022-12-03 10:48:26 +08:00
Jason Song f59a74852b
Update gitea-vet to check FSFE REUSE (#22004)
Related to:
- #21840
- https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-vet/pulls/21

What it looks like when it's working:
https://drone.gitea.io/go-gitea/gitea/64040/1/5

All available SPDX license identifiers: [SPDX License
List](https://spdx.org/licenses/).

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-02 22:14:57 +08:00
Jason Song 9607750b5e
Replace fmt.Sprintf with hex.EncodeToString (#21960)
`hex.EncodeToString` has better performance than `fmt.Sprintf("%x",
[]byte)`, we should use it as much as possible.

I'm not an extreme fan of performance, so I think there are some
exceptions:

- `fmt.Sprintf("%x", func(...)[N]byte())`
- We can't slice the function return value directly, and it's not worth
adding lines.
    ```diff
    func A()[20]byte { ... }
    - a := fmt.Sprintf("%x", A())
    - a := hex.EncodeToString(A()[:]) // invalid
    + tmp := A()
    + a := hex.EncodeToString(tmp[:])
    ```
- `fmt.Sprintf("%X", []byte)`
- `strings.ToUpper(hex.EncodeToString(bytes))` has even worse
performance.
2022-11-28 11:19:18 +00:00
flynnnnnnnnnn e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
zeripath f6fd501841
Correct the fallbacks for mailer configuration (#21945)
Unfortunately the fallback configuration code for [mailer] that were
added in #18982 are incorrect. When you read a value from an ini section
that key is added. This leads to a failure of the fallback mechanism.
Further there is also a spelling mistake in the startTLS configuration.

This PR restructures the mailer code to first map the deprecated
settings on to the new ones - and then use ini.MapTo to map those on to
the struct with additional validation as necessary.

Ref #21744

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-11-27 10:08:40 +00:00
zeripath 787f6c3227
Ensure that Webhook tasks are not double delivered (#21558)
When re-retrieving hook tasks from the DB double check if they have not
been delivered in the meantime. Further ensure that tasks are marked as
delivered when they are being delivered.

In addition:
* Improve the error reporting and make sure that the webhook task
population script runs in a separate goroutine.
* Only get hook task IDs out of the DB instead of the whole task when
repopulating the queue
* When repopulating the queue make the DB request paged

Ref #17940 

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-23 22:10:04 +08:00
Xinyu Zhou 68e934ab5d
Add option to enable CAPTCHA validation for login (#21638)
Enable this to require captcha validation for user login. You also must
enable `ENABLE_CAPTCHA`.

Summary:
- Consolidate CAPTCHA template
- add CAPTCHA handle and context
- add `REQUIRE_CAPTCHA_FOR_LOGIN` config and docs
- Consolidate CAPTCHA set-up and verification code 

Partially resolved #6049 

Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-11-22 21:13:18 +00:00
zeripath e77b76425e
Prepend refs/heads/ to issue template refs (#20461)
Fix #20456

At some point during the 1.17 cycle abbreviated refishs to issue
branches started breaking. This is likely due serious inconsistencies in
our management of refs throughout Gitea - which is a bug needing to be
addressed in a different PR. (Likely more than one)

We should try to use non-abbreviated `fullref`s as much as possible.
That is where a user has inputted a abbreviated `refish` we should add
`refs/heads/` if it is `branch` etc. I know people keep writing and
merging PRs that remove prefixes from stored content but it is just
wrong and it keeps causing problems like this. We should only remove the
prefix at the time of
presentation as the prefix is the only way of knowing umambiguously and
permanently if the `ref` is referring to a `branch`, `tag` or `commit` /
`SHA`. We need to make it so that every ref has the appropriate prefix,
and probably also need to come up with some definitely unambiguous way
of storing `SHA`s if they're used in a `ref` or `refish` field. We must
not store a potentially
ambiguous `refish` as a `ref`. (Especially when referring a `tag` -
there is no reason why users cannot create a `branch` with the same
short name as a `tag` and vice versa and any attempt to prevent this
will fail. You can even create a `branch` and a
`tag` that matches the `SHA` pattern.)

To that end in order to fix this bug, when parsing issue templates check
the provided `Ref` (here a `refish` because almost all users do not know
or understand the subtly), if it does not start with `refs/` add the
`BranchPrefix` to it. This allows people to make their templates refer
to a `tag` but not to a `SHA` directly. (I don't think that is
particularly unreasonable but if people disagree I can make the `refish`
be checked to see if it matches the `SHA` pattern.)

Next we need to handle the issue links that are already written. The
links here are created with `git.RefURL`

Here we see there is a bug introduced in #17551 whereby the provided
`ref` argument can be double-escaped so we remove the incorrect external
escape. (The escape added in #17551 is in the right place -
unfortunately I missed that the calling function was doing the wrong
thing.)

Then within `RefURL()` we check if an unprefixed `ref` (therefore
potentially a `refish`) matches the `SHA` pattern before assuming that
is actually a `commit` - otherwise is assumed to be a `branch`. This
will handle most of the problem cases excepting the very unusual cases
where someone has deliberately written a `branch` to look like a `SHA1`.

But please if something is called a `ref` or interpreted as a `ref` make
it a full-ref before storing or using it. By all means if something is a
`branch` assume the prefix is removed but always add it back in if you
are using it as a `ref`. Stop storing abbreviated `branch` names and
`tag` names - which are `refish` as a `ref`. It will keep on causing
problems like this.

Fix #20456

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-22 20:58:49 +08:00
Jason Song e4eaa68a2b
Replace yaml.v2 with yaml.v3 (#21832)
I don't see why we have to use two versions of yaml. The difference
between the two versions has nothing to do with our usage.
2022-11-21 16:36:59 +08:00
KN4CK3R 32db62515f
Add package registry cleanup rules (#21658)
Fixes #20514
Fixes #20766
Fixes #20631

This PR adds Cleanup Rules for the package registry. This allows to
delete unneeded packages automatically. Cleanup rules can be set up from
the user or org settings.
Please have a look at the documentation because I'm not a native english
speaker.

Rule Form

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199330792-c13918a6-e196-4e71-9f53-18554515edca.png)

Rule List

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199331261-5f6878e8-a80c-4985-800d-ebb3524b1a8d.png)

Rule Preview

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199330917-c95e4017-cf64-4142-a3e4-af18c4f127c3.png)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-20 16:08:38 +02:00
Jim Kirisame c8f3eb6acb
Fix wechatwork webhook sends empty content in PR review (#21762)
Wechatwork webhook is sending the following string for pull request reviews:

``` markdown
# 
>
```

This commit fixes this problem.
2022-11-19 15:19:14 +00:00
silverwind eec1c71880
Show syntax lexer name in file view/blame (#21814)
Show which Chroma Lexer is used to highlight the file in the file
header. It's useful for development to see what was detected, and I
think it's not bad info to have for the user:

<img width="233" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 22 31 16"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/201770854-44933dfc-70a4-487c-8457-1bb3cc43ea62.png">
<img width="226" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 22 36 06"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/201770856-9260ce6f-6c0f-442c-92b5-201e5b113188.png">
<img width="194" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 22 36 26"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/201770857-6f56591b-80ea-42cc-8ea5-21b9156c018b.png">

Also, I improved the way this header overflows on small screens:

<img width="354" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 22 44 36"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/201774828-2ddbcde1-da15-403f-bf7a-6248449fa2c5.png">

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-19 13:08:06 +02:00
KN4CK3R 044c754ea5
Add context.Context to more methods (#21546)
This PR adds a context parameter to a bunch of methods. Some helper
`xxxCtx()` methods got replaced with the normal name now.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-19 16:12:33 +08:00
Gary Moon 40229a7dd8
Skip GitHub migration tests if the API token is undefined (#21824)
GitHub migration tests will be skipped if the secret for the GitHub API
token hasn't been set.

This change should make all tests pass (or skip in the case of this one)
for anyone running the pipeline on their own infrastructure without
further action on their part.

Resolves https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21739

Signed-off-by: Gary Moon <gary@garymoon.net>
2022-11-15 15:22:16 -05:00
Jim Kirisame 0ace4cee33
Fix webhook attachment text is not set in review comment (#21763)
The `getPullRequestPayloadInfo` function is widely used in many webhook,
it works well when PR is open or edit. But when we comment in PR review
panel (not PR panel), the comment content is not set as
`attachmentText`.

This commit set comment content as `attachmentText` when PR review, so
webhook could obtain this information via this function.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2022-11-13 11:57:52 -05:00
Lunny Xiao 34283a74e8
Allow detect whether it's in a database transaction for a context.Context (#21756)
Fix #19513

This PR introduce a new db method `InTransaction(context.Context)`,
and also builtin check on `db.TxContext` and `db.WithTx`.
There is also a new method `db.AutoTx` has been introduced but could be used by other PRs.

`WithTx` will always open a new transaction, if a transaction exist in context, return an error.
`AutoTx` will try to open a new transaction if no transaction exist in context.
That means it will always enter a transaction if there is no error.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2022-11-12 21:18:50 +01:00
wxiaoguang fb704f6c72
Revert unrelated changes for SMTP auth (#21767)
The purpose of #18982 is to improve the SMTP mailer, but there were some
unrelated changes made to the SMTP auth in
d60c438694

This PR reverts these unrelated changes, fix #21744
2022-11-10 16:12:23 -05:00
KN4CK3R 20674dd05d
Add package registry quota limits (#21584)
Related #20471

This PR adds global quota limits for the package registry. Settings for
individual users/orgs can be added in a seperate PR using the settings
table.

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-09 14:34:27 +08:00
wxiaoguang 2900dc90a7
Improve valid user name check (#20136)
Close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21640

Before: Gitea can create users like ".xxx" or "x..y", which is not
ideal, it's already a consensus that dot filenames have special
meanings, and `a..b` is a confusing name when doing cross repo compare.

After: stricter

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-04 17:04:08 +08:00
oliverpool b6e81357bd
Add Webhook authorization header (#20926)
_This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_

## Context

In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:

- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872)
- TeamCity #18667
- Gitea instances #20267
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)

## Proposed solution

Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307).

This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872.

As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):


![2022-08-23-142911](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/186162483-5b721504-eef5-4932-812e-eb96a68494cc.png)

The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.

## Questions

- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind 
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~

## Done as well:

- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there


_Closes #19872_

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-03 20:23:20 +02:00
kolaente 085f717529
feat: notify doers of a merge when automerging (#21553)
I found myself wondering whether a PR I scheduled for automerge was
actually merged. It was, but I didn't receive a mail notification for it
- that makes sense considering I am the doer and usually don't want to
receive such notifications. But ideally I want to receive a notification
when a PR was merged because I scheduled it for automerge.

This PR implements exactly that.

The implementation works, but I wonder if there's a way to avoid passing
the "This PR was automerged" state down so much. I tried solving this
via the database (checking if there's an automerge scheduled for this PR
when sending the notification) but that did not work reliably, probably
because sending the notification happens async and the entry might have
already been deleted. My implementation might be the most
straightforward but maybe not the most elegant.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-03 23:49:00 +08:00
Chongyi Zheng 81ea4f95a0
Handle branch name with prefix in GitHub migration (#20357)
GitHub allows releases with target commitish `refs/heads/BRANCH`, which
then causes issues in Gitea after migration. This fix handles cases that
a branch already has a prefix.

Fixes #20317

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-11-03 10:32:52 +08:00
Gusted c2d2323fc8
Configure update checker on installation page (#21655)
- I recently became aware that this was enabled by-default, I don't
necessary agree with that and this should rather be configured by the
user(this patch does that on the installation page) as it connects to a
homeserver, which I'd prefer to avoid on my instance.


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25481501/199260613-a77a1b10-347a-4542-8982-9b9b24dad28c.png)
2022-11-01 19:23:56 +00:00
zeripath f211d235c7
Fix repository adoption on Windows (#21646)
A bug was introduced in #17865 where filepath.Join is used to join
putative unadopted repository owner and names together. This is
incorrect as these names are then used as repository names - which shoud
have the '/' separator. This means that adoption will not work on
Windows servers.

Fix #21632

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-10-31 23:16:48 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 9a70a12a34
Merge db.Iterate and IterateObjects (#21641)
These two functions are similiar, merge them.
2022-10-31 23:51:14 +08:00
techknowlogick 3f7cab42dc
Revert "Do not send notifications for draft releases (#21451)" (#21594)
This reverts commit a37e8b275d / #21451

Temporarily revert this PR to be able to continue discussion, and
potentially get it into 1.19.0
2022-10-26 00:00:00 +02:00
delvh 0ebb45cfe7
Replace all instances of fmt.Errorf(%v) with fmt.Errorf(%w) (#21551)
Found using
`find . -type f -name '*.go' -print -exec vim {} -c
':%s/fmt\.Errorf(\(.*\)%v\(.*\)err/fmt.Errorf(\1%w\2err/g' -c ':wq' \;`

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-10-24 20:29:17 +01:00
M Hickford 191a74d622
Record OAuth client type at registration (#21316)
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.

> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
>   maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
>   confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
>   **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.

 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4

> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.

Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1

> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message

Fixes #21299

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-10-24 15:59:24 +08:00
wxiaoguang dcd9fc7ee8
Refactor git command arguments and make all arguments to be safe to be used (#21535)
Follow #21464

Make all git command arguments strictly safe. Most changes are one-to-one replacing, keep all existing logic.
2022-10-23 22:44:45 +08:00
Yarden Shoham 88a03a6133
Link mentioned user in markdown only if they are visible to viewer (#21554)
We need to make sure a user can't confirm the existence of a user with
private visibility

* Follow up on #21533 

### Before
#### User

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20454870/197357580-340911d7-1659-4fc9-a9f6-7ed6bc3476b4.png)

#### Admin

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20454870/197357676-a8f0ae63-8f80-4221-a9b5-b6311552910a.png)

### After
#### User

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20454870/197357536-05616edb-7821-469d-8e51-6f8cb84c1362.png)

#### Admin

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20454870/197357703-071fe984-de79-43aa-a77c-a85b046292a4.png)

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-10-23 17:13:52 +08:00
Yarden Shoham 63ebb53fd5
Add link to user profile in markdown mention only if user exists (#21533)
Previously mentioning a user would link to its profile, regardless of
whether the user existed. This change tests if the user exists and only
if it does - a link to its profile is added.

* Fixes #3444

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-10-23 01:15:52 +08:00
Ashley Nelson 82ecd3b19e
Update milestone counters when issue is deleted (#21459)
When actions besides "delete" are performed on issues, the milestone
counter is updated. However, since deleting issues goes through a
different code path, the associated milestone's count wasn't being
updated, resulting in inaccurate counts until another issue in the same
milestone had a non-delete action performed on it.

I verified this change fixes the inaccurate counts using a local docker
build.

Fixes #21254

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-10-22 23:08:10 +08:00
KN4CK3R 154efa59a5
Prevent Authorization header for presigned LFS urls (#21531)
Fixes #21525

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-10-22 21:36:44 +08:00
KN4CK3R 1887c95254
Decouple HookTask from Repository (#17940)
At the moment a repository reference is needed for webhooks. With the
upcoming package PR we need to send webhooks without a repository
reference. For example a package is uploaded to an organization. In
theory this enables the usage of webhooks for future user actions.

This PR removes the repository id from `HookTask` and changes how the
hooks are processed (see `services/webhook/deliver.go`). In a follow up
PR I want to remove the usage of the `UniqueQueue´ and replace it with a
normal queue because there is no reason to be unique.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2022-10-21 18:21:56 +02:00
delvh 6a0330979f
Ignore error when retrieving changed PR review files (#21487)
When a PR reviewer reviewed a file on a commit that was later gc'ed,
they would always get a `500` response from then on when loading the PR.
This PR simply ignores that error and instead marks all files as
unchanged.
This approach was chosen as the only feasible option without diving into
**a lot** of error handling.

Fixes #21392

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-10-20 16:29:40 +08:00
6543 bd272e416a
move invite by mail to services package (#21513)
followup  #20307
close #21511

-> make it easy to also add API equivalent later ...
2022-10-20 11:23:31 +08:00
KN4CK3R c3b2e44392
Add team member invite by email (#20307)
Allows to add (not registered) team members by email.

related #5353

Invite by mail:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/178154779-adcc547f-c0b7-4a2a-a131-4e41a3d9d3ad.png)

Pending invitations:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/178154882-9d739bb8-2b04-46c1-a025-c1f4be26af98.png)

Email:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/178164716-f2f90893-7ba6-4a5e-a3db-42538a660258.png)

Join form:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/178154840-aaab983a-d922-4414-b01a-9b1a19c5cef7.png)

Co-authored-by: Jack Hay <jjphay@gmail.com>
2022-10-19 14:40:28 +02:00
zeripath 716fcfcf72
Make every not exist error unwrappable to a fs.ErrNotExist (#20891)
A lot of our code is repeatedly testing if individual errors are
specific types of Not Exist errors. This is repetitative and unnecesary.
`Unwrap() error` provides a common way of labelling an error as a
NotExist error and we can/should use this.

This PR has chosen to use the common `io/fs` errors e.g.
`fs.ErrNotExist` for our errors. This is in some ways not completely
correct as these are not filesystem errors but it seems like a
reasonable thing to do and would allow us to simplify a lot of our code
to `errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist)` instead of
`package.IsErr...NotExist(err)`

I am open to suggestions to use a different base error - perhaps
`models/db.ErrNotExist` if that would be felt to be better.


Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-10-18 07:50:37 +02:00