Allow disabling search field / make search field less obtrusive #294

Closed
opened 2023-11-08 10:11:43 +01:00 by kupper · 21 comments

Description

With the last release of custom menu you added a search field. This search field covers almost the whole menu, so that the menu entries cannot be read any more (see attached screenshots). Please add an option to hide this search field – or place it in a less obtrusive way.

Benefits

Users can read the names of the menu entries again. (See screenshot without the search field.)

More informations

No response

### Description With the last release of custom menu you added a search field. This search field covers almost the whole menu, so that the menu entries cannot be read any more (see attached screenshots). Please add an option to hide this search field – or place it in a less obtrusive way. ### Benefits Users can read the names of the menu entries again. (See screenshot without the search field.) ### More informations _No response_
kupper added the
enhancement
label 2023-11-08 10:11:43 +01:00
Owner

Hi,

Could you remove the cache of your browser?

Hi, Could you remove the cache of your browser?
deblan added the
not reproduced
label 2023-11-08 11:01:13 +01:00
Author

Could you remove the cache of your browser?

No difference :-/.

> Could you remove the cache of your browser? No difference :-/.
Owner

What is your browser and its version?

What is your browser and its version?
Author

Chrome 118.0.5993.88 (64 bit) on Linux.

Chrome 118.0.5993.88 (64 bit) on Linux.
Author

It looks the same in Firefox.
The amount of space the search field covers depends on the form factor of your display. (Worst on mobile.)

It looks the same in Firefox. The amount of space the search field covers depends on the form factor of your display. (Worst on mobile.)
deblan added the
WIP
label 2023-11-10 19:49:51 +01:00
Owner

I'm not able to reproduce on:

  • Firefox Linux
  • Chrome Linux
  • Vivalid Linux
  • Firefox Windows
  • Edge Windows
  • Firefox Android
  • Internet (Samsung Browser Android)
I'm not able to reproduce on: - Firefox Linux - Chrome Linux - Vivalid Linux - Firefox Windows - Edge Windows - Firefox Android - Internet (Samsung Browser Android)
Owner

Can you test the shortcut please? ctrl + shift + r

Can you test the shortcut please? `ctrl + shift + r`
Owner

Can you share the content of https://your.cloud/apps/side_menu/css/sideMenu.css please?

Can you share the content of `https://your.cloud/apps/side_menu/css/sideMenu.css` please?
Author

What do you mean, you con not reproduce that? It is rock solid reproducible on any broser out there...?

I'm not able to reproduce on:

  • Firefox Linux
  • Chrome Linux
  • Vivalid Linux
  • Firefox Windows
  • Edge Windows
  • Firefox Android
  • Internet (Samsung Browser Android)
What do you mean, you con not reproduce that? It is rock solid reproducible on any broser out there...? > I'm not able to reproduce on: > - Firefox Linux > - Chrome Linux > - Vivalid Linux > - Firefox Windows > - Edge Windows > - Firefox Android > - Internet (Samsung Browser Android)
Author

Please browse to https://cloud.kg-fds.de. I will create a test login just for you ;-).

Please browse to https://cloud.kg-fds.de. I will create a test login just for you ;-).
Owner

What do you mean, you con not reproduce that? It is rock solid reproducible on any broser out there...?

I'm not able to reproduce on:

  • Firefox Linux
  • Chrome Linux
  • Vivalid Linux
  • Firefox Windows
  • Edge Windows
  • Firefox Android
  • Internet (Samsung Browser Android)

I can't view the bug myself and I tried with all of these browsers.

> What do you mean, you con not reproduce that? It is rock solid reproducible on any broser out there...? > > > I'm not able to reproduce on: > > - Firefox Linux > > - Chrome Linux > > - Vivalid Linux > > - Firefox Windows > > - Edge Windows > > - Firefox Android > > - Internet (Samsung Browser Android) > > I can't view the bug myself and I tried with all of these browsers.
Owner

Please browse to https://cloud.kg-fds.de. I will create a test login just for you ;-).

Well done! You can use this email: simon [@at@] deblan.fr

> Please browse to https://cloud.kg-fds.de. I will create a test login just for you ;-). Well done! You can use this email: simon [@at@] deblan.fr
Author

Hi, here's our css.

Hi, here's our css.
Author

I can't view the bug myself and I tried with all of these browsers.

Okay, just installed it on my private Nextcloud instance and the bug is not present. Instead the menu shows the nextcloud logo at the top, which the other doesn't. We're coming closer, I think ;-).

> I can't view the bug myself and I tried with all of these browsers. Okay, just installed it on my private Nextcloud instance and the bug is *not* present. Instead the menu shows the nextcloud logo at the top, which the other doesn't. We're coming closer, I think ;-).
Author

Okay, if I chose "display logo: no" in the settings, the search fiel appears top left in the menu and does not cover the text. That's acceptable. Still, I don't know why no logo is shown if I set "display logo" to yes?

Okay, if I chose "display logo: no" in the settings, the search fiel appears top left in the menu and does not cover the text. That's acceptable. Still, I don't know why no logo is shown if I set "display logo" to yes?
Author

I now was able to reproduce the issue with my private instance (see screenshot). The bug is only present if you chose the global layout "with categories". As soon as I switch to this layout, the logo disappears and the search field covers half of the menu.
Could you try this setting?

I now was able to reproduce the issue with my private instance (see screenshot). The bug is only present if you chose the global layout "with categories". As soon as I switch to this layout, the logo disappears and the search field covers half of the menu. Could you try this setting?
Author
No description provided.
deblan added
reproduced
and removed
not reproduced
labels 2023-11-12 16:38:55 +01:00
deblan added
bug
next release
and removed
enhancement
WIP
labels 2023-11-12 16:55:14 +01:00
Owner

Fixed in v3.11.1!

Fixed in v3.11.1!
deblan removed the
next release
label 2023-11-12 17:13:16 +01:00
Author

Formidable! Merci!

Formidable! Merci!
Author

Hi, sorry for bothering you again ;-).
There's still a little difference in the two layouts that affects the "categories" layout on mobile devices:

  • In the standard layout, the search field is placed on the top right of the menu. Upon opening the menu it is not active unless it is clicked upon.
  • In the categories layout it is placed on the top left which makes it the first element in the menu. Upon opening the menu, the search field is automatically selected as the active element, which triggers the keyboard on mobile devices. Every time you open the menu, the virtual keyboard pops up which is a little disturbing, since you won't need it in most cases.
    Can you change the arrangement so that the keyboard is not triggered each time users open the menu?
    Thanks!
Hi, sorry for bothering you again ;-). There's still a little difference in the two layouts that affects the "categories" layout on mobile devices: - In the standard layout, the search field is placed on the top right of the menu. Upon opening the menu it is not active unless it is clicked upon. - In the categories layout it is placed on the top left which makes it the first element in the menu. Upon opening the menu, the search field is automatically selected as the active element, which triggers the keyboard on mobile devices. Every time you open the menu, the virtual keyboard pops up which is a little disturbing, since you won't need it in most cases. Can you change the arrangement so that the keyboard is not triggered each time users open the menu? Thanks!
kupper reopened this issue 2023-11-13 19:36:02 +01:00
Owner
No problem! Juste open an new issue using this link: https://gitnet.fr/deblan/side_menu/issues/new?template=.gitea%2fissue_template%2fISSUE_TEMPLATE.yml
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: deblan/side_menu#294
No description provided.