Once this is getting hooked up, it'll periodically delete old
messages.
The StoragePolicy can be chosen by the user, currently there's
two versions, delete everything based on age is the obvious.
The other is for the data hoarders among us. It'll only delete
message types which can be considered low value... Types with
a time aspect like away / back... joins / parts etc.
It tries to do that in a sensible way, so that we don't block
all other db writers that are ongoing.
The "periodically" interval is by design not exposed to the user.
The TS rewrite dropped the form that was expected to be passed
as props.
That lead to the password change being borked, as the fields
were always set to "null".
We don't need a form, can just use refs here.
https://github.com/thelounge/thelounge/pull/4649 broke existing
themes by removing the colored-nicks class from chat.
Considering that we don't bump the major version, keep backwards
compatibility for now
Currently, in `ChatInput.vue` we call `upload.abort()` which removes the event listeners, which are never added back. This effectively permanently disable uploads if the user navigates away to Settings or any other non-chat pages, and back.
Moves the binding to `mounted()` so that they're properly rebound when a chat window is in view, and also adds an `unmounted()` for clarity.
This should also fix an edge case if the page opens up on a non-chat page and there was never a ChatInput to unbind it, such as login page or add network pages.
PR #4649 introduced a regression on the Morning theme as the `#chat.colored-nicks` CSS selector was removed from Default but not Morning. The result is that Morning no longer had nick colors.
Prior to this, the search is still racy but one tends to notice
this only when the DB is large or network is involved.
The user can initiate a search, get bored, navigate to another chan
issue a different search.
Now however, the results of the first search come back in and
hilarity ensues as we are now confused with the state.
To avoid this, keep track of the last search done and any result
that comes in that isn't equal to the active query is garbage and
can be dropped.
This means we also apply the collapsing to normal queries,
which might also collapse other things like joins / quits
which may be undesired by some
Fixes: https://github.com/thelounge/thelounge/issues/4583
The only thing that cares about user colors is the user component.
Putting a class value on the chat component seems to be the wrong
place.
This also allows us to remove various css selectors so that we
don't need to be that specific.
After all whatever has that class needs to be colored, we don't
care where it is.
During a search, we get the results from oldest --> newest.
When we hit the more button, we get the results of the second batch
in the same order.
However, logically to the first batch everything is older, so we
need to prepend it to the result array, not
append.
msg DB logical ID
A 3 5
B 2 4
C 1 3
D 3 2
E 2 1
F 1 0
Offset is eventually passed to sqlite as an OFFSET clause.
This works as follows:
sqlite> select num from seq limit 5 offset 0;
┌─────┐
│ num │
├─────┤
│ 1 │
│ 2 │
│ 3 │
│ 4 │
│ 5 │
└─────┘
sqlite> select num from seq limit 5 offset 5;
┌─────┐
│ num │
├─────┤
│ 6 │
│ 7 │
│ 8 │
│ 9 │
│ 10 │
└─────┘
However, the code currently emits a request for offset + 1, which ends
up skipping a message
sqlite> select num from seq limit 5 offset 5+1;
┌─────┐
│ num │
├─────┤
│ 7 │
│ 8 │
│ 9 │
│ 10 │
│ 11 │
└─────┘
Nachtalb put some infra in place that was never actually working.
It errors out when a user clicks on a message.
Remove the offending code, but keep it all in place so that we
can improve on it.
When we hit doSearch, we always reset the offset value to 0,
meaning we always hit the conditional (!0) and always set the
messageSearchInProgress flag to undefined.
This is wrong, we do want to set this flag when we initiate a search.
Our regex escape function escapes proper regexes, however
it isn't meant to be shoved into a char class via string interpolation.
We need to also escape '-' if we do so.
