Adding text to vignette

This commit is contained in:
prise6 2015-07-24 20:24:09 +02:00
parent 2fa7af0d41
commit 1688e22520
1 changed files with 191 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -12,15 +12,18 @@ vignette: >
# Introduction
The goal of this vignette is to show most of all possibilies with *VT* (for *VirtualTwins*) package.
The goal of this vignette is to show most of all possibilies with *aVT* (for *aVirtualTwins* meaning *a*daptation of *Virtual Twins* method) package.
*VT* method (Jared Foster and al, 2011) has been created to find subgroup of patients with enhanced treatment effect, if it exists. Theorically, this method can be used for binary and continous outcome. This package only deals with binary outcome in a two arms clinical trial.
*VT* method is based on random forests and regression/classification trees.
I decided to use a simulated dataset called *sepsis* in order to show how *VT* package can be used. Type `?sepsis` to know more about this dataset. Anyway, the true subgroup is `PRAPACHE <= 26 & AGE <= 49.80`.
I decided to use a simulated dataset called *sepsis* in order to show how *aVT* package can be used. Type `?sepsis` to know more about this dataset. Anyway, the true subgroup is `PRAPACHE <= 26 & AGE <= 49.80`.
**NOTE:** This true subgroup is defined with the *lower* event rate (`survival = 1`) in treatement arm. Therefore in following examples we'll search the subgroup with the *highest* event rate, and we know it is `PRAPACHE > 26 & AGE > 49.80`.
**NOTE:** This true subgroup is defined with the *lower* event rate (`survival = 1`) in treatement arm. Therefore in following examples we'll search the subgroup with the *highest* event rate, and we know it is
`PRAPACHE > 26 & AGE > 49.80`.
-----------
# Quick preview
@ -36,7 +39,7 @@ Data used in *VT* are modelized by $\left\{Y, T, X_1, \ldots, X_{p-2}\right\}$.
Type `?formatRCTDataset` for details.
Related functions/classes in VirtualTwins package : `VT.object()`, `vt.data()`, `formatRCTDataset`.
Related functions/classes in aVirtualTwins package : `VT.object()`, `vt.data()`, `formatRCTDataset`.
## Method
@ -49,11 +52,14 @@ let $X = \left\{X_1, \ldots, X_{p-2}\right\}$
### First Step
* Grow a random forest with data $\left\{Y, T, X \right\}$.
* Grow a random forest with interaction treatement / covariable, i.e. $\left\{Y, T, X, XI(T_i=0), XI(T_i=1)\right\}$
* Grow two random forests, one for each treatement.
* Grow two random forests, one for each treatement:
+ The first with data $\left\{Y, X \right\}$ where $T_i = 0$
+ The second with data $\left\{Y, X \right\}$ where $T_i = 1$
* Build your own model
From one of these methods you can estimate $\hat{P_{1i}}$ and $\hat{P_{0i}}$.
Related functions/classes in VirtualTwins package : `VT.difft()`, `VT.forest()`, `VT.forest.one()`, `VT.forest.double()`, `VT.forest.fold()`.
Related functions/classes in aVirtualTwins package : `VT.difft()`, `VT.forest()`, `VT.forest.one()`, `VT.forest.double()`, `VT.forest.fold()`.
### Second Step
@ -64,17 +70,50 @@ Define $Z_i = \hat{P_{1i}} - \hat{P_{0i}}$
The idea is to identify which covariable from $X$ described variation of $Z$.
Related functions/classes in VirtualTwins package : `VT.tree()`, `VT.tree.class()`, `VT.tree.reg()`.
Related functions/classes in aVirtualTwins package : `VT.tree()`, `VT.tree.class()`, `VT.tree.reg()`.
-----------
# Sepsis dataset
See __Introduction__.
# Examples
*Sepsis* dataset is a simulated clinical trial with two groups treatment about sepsis desease. See details.
This dataset is taken from [SIDES method](http://biopharmnet.com/wiki/Software_for_subgroup_identification_and_analysis)
## Create object VirtualTwins
*Sepsis* contains simulated data on 470 subjects with a binary outcome survival, that stores survival status for patient after 28 days of treatment, value of 1 for subjects who died after 28 days and 0 otherwise. There are 11 covariates, listed below, all of which are numerical variables.
Note that contrary to the original dataset used in SIDES, missing values have been imputed by random forest `randomForest::rfImpute()`. See file *data-raw/sepsis.R* for more details.
In order to begin the two steps of *VT* method, VirtualTwins package need to be initialized with `vt.data()` function.
True subgroup is `PRAPACHE <= 26 & AGE <= 49.80`. __NOTE:__ This subgroup is defined with the *lower* event rate (survival = 1) in treatement arm.
470 patients and 13 variables:
* `survival` : binary outcome
* `THERAPY` : 1 for active treatment, 0 for control treatment
* `TIMFIRST` : Time from first sepsis-organ fail to start drug
* `AGE` : Patient age in years
* `BLLPLAT` : Baseline local platelets
* `blSOFA` : Sum of baselin sofa (cardiovascular, hematology, hepaticrenal, and respiration scores)
* `BLLCREAT` : Base creatinine
* `ORGANNUM` : Number of baseline organ failures
* `PRAPACHE` : Pre-infusion apache-ii score
* `BLGCS` : Base GLASGOW coma scale score
* `BLIL6` : Baseline serum IL-6 concentration
* `BLADL` : Baseline activity of daily living score
* `BLLBILI` : Baseline local bilirubin
__Source:__ http://biopharmnet.com/wiki/Software_for_subgroup_identification_and_analysis
-----------
# Create object VirtualTwins
In order to begin the two steps of *VT* method, aVirtualTwins package needs to be initialized with `vt.data()` function.
type `?vt.data` for more details.
__NOTE:__ if running VT with interactions between $T$ and $X$, set `interactions = TRUE`.
@ -116,16 +155,25 @@ rm(vt.o.tmp, cat.x, sepsis.tmp)
```
## Step 1 : compute $\hat{P_{1i}}$ and $\hat{P_{0i}}$
-----------
# Step 1 : compute $\hat{P_{1i}}$ and $\hat{P_{0i}}$
As described earlier, step 1 can be done via differents ways
### Simple Random Forest
## Simple Random Forest
Following example used *sepsis* data created in previous part.
To perform simple random forest on `VT.object`, `randomForest`, `caret` and `party` package can be used.
Class `VT.forest.one` is used. It takes in arguments :
* `vt.object` : return of `vt.data()` function
* `model` : A random forest model
* `interactions` : logical, `TRUE` is default value
__with `randomForest`__
```{r}
# use randomForest::randomForest()
@ -139,6 +187,8 @@ model.rf <- randomForest(x = vt.o$getX(interactions = T),
y = vt.o$getY())
# initialize VT.forest.one
vt.f.rf <- VT.forest.one(vt.o, model.rf)
# Then, use run() to compute probabilities
vt.f.rf$run()
```
__with `party`__
@ -156,6 +206,8 @@ __with `party`__
# model.cf <- cforest(formula = vt.o$getFormula(), data = vt.o$getData(interactions = T))
# # initialize VT.forest.one
# vt.f.cf <- VT.forest.one(vt.o, model.cf)
# # Then, use run() to compute probabilities
# vt.f.cf$run()
```
__with `caret`__
@ -186,13 +238,139 @@ model.tr <- train(x = vt.o.tr$getX(interactions = T),
trControl = fitControl)
# initialize VT.forest.one
vt.f.tr <- VT.forest.one(vt.o.tr, model.tr)
# Then, use run() to compute probabilities
vt.f.tr$run()
```
### Double Random Forest
## Double Random Forest
To perform double random forest on `VT.object`, same packages as simple random forest can be used.
Class `VT.forest.double` is used. It takes in arguments :
* `vt.object` : return of `vt.data()` function
* `model_trt1` : a random forest model for $T=1$
* `model_trt0` : a random forest model for $T=0$
__NOTE:__ use `trt` parameter in `VT.object::getX()` or `VT.object::getY()` methods to obtain part of data depending on treatment. See following example.
__with `randomForest`__
```{r}
# grow RF for T = 1
model.rf.trt1 <- randomForest(x = vt.o$getX(trt = 1),
y = vt.o$getY(trt = 1))
# grow RF for T = 0
model.rf.trt0 <- randomForest(x = vt.o$getX(trt = 0),
y = vt.o$getY(trt = 0))
# initialize VT.forest.double()
vt.doublef.rf <- VT.forest.double(vt.o, model.rf.trt1, model.rf.trt0)
# Then, use run() to compute probabilities
vt.doublef.rf$run()
```
Follow the same structure for `caret` or `cforest` models.
## K Fold Random Forest
This idea is taken from *method 3* of Jared Foster paper :
> A modification of [previous methods] is to obtain $\hat{P_{1i}}$ and $\hat{P_{0i}}$ via cross-validation. In this méthod the specific data for subject $i$ is not used to obtain $\hat{P_{1i}}$ and $\hat{P_{0i}}$. Using k-fold cross-validation, we apply random forest regression approach to $\frac{k-1}{k}$ of the data and use the resulting predictor to obtain estimates of $P_{1i}$ and $P_{0i}$ for the remaining $\frac{1}{k}$ of the observations. This is repeated $k$ times.
To use this approach, type `VirtualTwins:::VT.forest.fold()`. This class takes in argument :
* `vt.object` : return of `vt.data()` function
* `fold` : number of fold (e.g. $5$)
* `ratio` : Control of sampsize balance. `ratio` of $2$ means that there 2 times le highest level compared to the other. "Highest" means the level with larger observations. It's in test.
* `interactions` : Logical. If `TRUE`, interactions between covariables and treatments are used. `FALSE` otherwise.
__NOTE:__ This function use only `randomForest` package.
```{r, cache=TRUE}
# initialize k-fold RF
model.fold <- VirtualTwins:::VT.forest.fold(vt.o, fold = 5, ratio = 1, interactions = T)
# grow RF with randomForest package options
# set do.trace option to see the 5 folds
model.fold$run(ntree = 500, do.trace = 500)
```
## Build Your Own Model
Random Forests are not the only models you can use to compute $\hat{P_{1i}}$ and $\hat{P_{0i}}$. Any prediction model can be used, as logitic regression, boosting ...
Anyway, aVirtualTwins package can be used. To do so, you can use `VT.difft()` class. It is important to note this the parent class of all "forests" classes. It takes in argument :
* `vt.object` : return of `vt.data()` function
* `twin1` : estimate of $P(Y_{i} = 1 | T = T_{i})$ : meaning response probability under the correct treatment.
* `twin1` : estimate of $P(Y_{i} = 1 | T = 1-T_{i})$ : meaning response probability under the other treatment.
* `method` : _absolute_ (default), _relative_ or _logit_. See `?VT.difft()` for details.
```{r}
# you get twin1 and twin2 by your own method
# here, i'll use random number between 0 and 1 :
twin1_random <- runif(470)
twin2_random <- runif(470)
# then you can initialize VT.difft class :
model.difft <- VT.difft(vt.o, twin1 = twin1_random, twin2 = twin2_random, "absolute")
# compute difference of twins :
model.difft$computeDifft()
# See results
head(model.difft$difft)
# Graph :
# hist(model.difft$difft)
```
__NOTE: Also, you can clone repository, write your own child class of `VT.difft()` AND submit it !__
------------
# Step 2 : Estimate a Regression or Classification Tree
As described in the method, we define $Z_i = \hat{P_{1i}} - \hat{P_{0i}}$. It's the difference in term of response of the active treatments compared to the control treatment. The idea is to try to explain this difference by few covariables.
## Classification
We define a new variable $Z^{*}$, $Z^{*}_i=1$ if $Z_i > c$ and $Z^{*}_i=0$ otherwise. Classification tree's goal is to explain the value $Z^*=1$.
$c$ is a threshold given by the user. It's the threshold for which the difference is "interesting". One idea is to use quantiles of the *difft* distribution.
To compute a classifiction tree, `VT.tree.class()` is used. Internally, `rpart::rpart()` is computed. It takes in argument:
* `vt.difft` : `VT.difft` object
* `threshold` : $0.05$ by default, corresponds to $c$
* `sens` : `c(">", "<")`. `sens` corresponds to the way $Z^{*}$ is defined.
* `">"` (default) : $Z^{*}$, $Z^{*}_i=1$ if $Z_i > c$ and $Z^{*}_i=0$ otherwise.
* `"<"` : $Z^{*}$, $Z^{*}_i=1$ if $Z_i < c$ and $Z^{*}_i=0$ otherwise.
* `screening` : `NULL` is default value. If `TRUE` only covariables in `varimp` `vt.object` 's field is used.
See `?VT.tree` for details.
```{r}
# initialize classification tree
tr.class <- VT.tree.class(vt.f.rf, sens = ">", threshold = quantile(vt.f.rf$difft, 0.7))
# compute tree with rpart option
tr.class$run(cp = 0, maxdepth = 3, maxcompete = 1)
```
## Regression
Use regression tree to explain $Z$ by covariables $X$. Then some leafs have predicted $Z_i$ greater than the threshold $c$ (if $sens$ is ">"), and it defines which covariables explain $Z$.
The class to use is `VT.tree.reg()`. It takes same parameters than classification mehod.
```{r}
# initialize regression tree
tr.reg <- VT.tree.reg(vt.f.rf, sens = ">", threshold = quantile(vt.f.rf$difft, 0.7))
# compute tree with rpart option
tr.reg$run(cp = 0, maxdepth = 3, maxcompete = 1)
```
## Subgroups and results