mirror of
https://github.com/Respect/Validation.git
synced 2024-06-13 11:12:18 +02:00
d36572cc25
Currently, the Property rule has a third parameter that allows the validation of the wrapped rule to be optional, meaning that the validation will only happen if the property exists. That parameter makes the rule harder to understand at times. I'm splitting the Property rule into Property, PropertyExists, and PropertyOptional. That way, it becomes apparent when someone wants only to validate whether a property exists or if they will validate the value of the property only when it exists. I deliberately didn't create an abstract class because those rules are different enough not to have an abstraction. In fact, I can see myself deleting the AbstractRelated after I refactor the KeyNested rule. Signed-off-by: Henrique Moody <henriquemoody@gmail.com>
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
KeyExists
KeyExists(int|string $key)
Validates if the given key exists in an array.
v::keyExists('name')->validate(['name' => 'The Respect Panda']); // true
v::keyExists('name')->validate(['email' => 'therespectpanda@gmail.com']); // false
v::keyExists(0)->validate(['a', 'b', 'c']); // true
v::keyExists(4)->validate(['a', 'b', 'c']); // false
v::keyExists('username')->validate(new ArrayObject(['username' => 'therespectpanda'])); // true
v::keyExists(5)->validate(new ArrayObject(['a', 'b', 'c'])); // false
Notes
- To validate an array against a given rule if the key exists, use KeyOptional instead.
- To validate an array against a given rule requiring the key to exist, use Key instead.
Categorization
- Arrays
- Structures
Changelog
Version | Description |
---|---|
3.0.0 | Created from Key |
See also: